Posted in Film, Media, Members, Research on May 14, 2014|
Last fall Martin Baumann of Lucerne came to MPI for a talk. The topic of his current research seems to shift from his “Westward path of Buddhism” to a broader understanding of religions in relation to their sociocultural bridge-building function for immigrant communities in Europe. In his case studies of Vietnamese and Tibetan Buddhists in Switzerland, Buddhism is not necessarily modernized in a European context but remains within its ethnic communities with social and moral functions for the cultural integration of Buddhist immigrants into their new host country. He successfully builds his argument with well-researched ethnographic and statistical evidence.

Turning prayer wheel. © Dan Smyer Yu
In comparison Buddhism of immigrant communities in the U.S. is differently perceived. I recall Jan Nattier’s phrases “baggage Buddhism,” “baggage Buddhists,” and “ethnic Buddhists” (1997). These controversial coinages in the late 1990s continue to meet contentions from Asian American Buddhists and, meanwhile, generate scholarly currency on topics of religion and immigration, and race and religion in North America. According to Nattier’s observation, Asian American Buddhist communities are “deliberately monoethnic in membership;” therefore their social networks are ethnically inbound instead of being integrative toward the mainstream society. So, allegedly “ethnic Buddhists” do not contribute to the building of “Westward Dharma” or “modern Buddhism” but build resource networks for their worldly wellbeing as immigrants in their host country. In the U.S. context, Asian American Buddhists, especially Japanese American Buddhists, whom I know, are not comfortable with Nattier’s reading of Asian American Buddhist communities, and receive it as a kind of ethnicization or racialization of Asian American Buddhists.
(more…)
Read Full Post »